J.Ok. Rowling Faces Backlash After Saying ‘There Are No Trans Children’

J.Ok. Rowling is going through backlash for her controversial views on transgender points, together with latest claims that “there are not any trans youngsters.”

As a result of her remarks, the creator has discovered herself on the middle of one other social media storm months after being slammed for her remarks about boxer Imane Khelife.

Regardless of J.Ok. Rowling’s remarks, HBO has defended her function within the upcoming “Harry Potter” sequence, stating that her inventive enter is invaluable.

Rowling has confronted backlash in recent times for her outspoken views on gender and girls’s rights, and now the “Harry Potter” creator has as soon as once more sparked controversy along with her latest remarks, asserting that “there are not any trans youngsters” and dismissing the concept people will be born within the unsuitable physique.

In a publish on X, Rowling responded to a critic accusing her of “hateful give attention to trans youngsters,” writing: “There are not any trans youngsters. No youngster is ‘born within the unsuitable physique.'”

She doubled down: “There are solely adults such as you, ready to sacrifice the well being of minors to bolster your perception in an ideology that can find yourself wreaking extra hurt than lobotomies and false reminiscence syndrome mixed.”

Rowling’s assertion triggered a wave of reactions from throughout X (previously Twitter).

Supporters thanked the creator for defending what they noticed because the well-being of youngsters, with one person writing: “‘Thanks for being a robust voice in defending kids.”

One other commented, “Thanks for utilizing your voice and recognition to convey mild to reality and rescue kids from life-altering errors.”

Nevertheless, not everybody agreed with Rowling’s assertion, as a number of on the social media platform criticized her stance.

One critic sarcastically questioned her authority on the topic, commenting, “You are additionally a medical professional. Did not know that. This factor that everybody well-known for something feels the urge to behave as an professional of one thing else… makes me loopy!”

One other particular person famous: “Did not notice my companion does not exist! i suppose she by no means was a trans child like, critically. What do you say to the many individuals who transitioned youthful and reside blissful lives now ?”

Yet another particular person mentioned, “I recall listening to Margaret Thatcher say this very factor again within the late 80s about gays and lesbians. What a means to make use of your voice and platform. Have you ever ever thought of really caring about ladies? You’ve got aligned your self with a few of the worst misogynists as an alternative. Unconscionable”

Earlier this yr, Rowling shared that former colleagues who had distanced themselves from her in public because of her views on transgender points privately reached out to “verify they have been nonetheless associates.”

The creator has been vocal about her opposition to phrases like “individuals who menstruate,” describing such phrases and phrases as “cis” as rooted in ideology.

Regardless of her controversial stance, Rowling had earlier maintained that she helps the transgender neighborhood. In keeping with the Each day Mail, In June 2020, she revealed that she “cherished trans individuals” however famous that “erasing the idea of intercourse removes the power of many to meaningfully talk about their lives.”

Nevertheless, ever since, Rowling has solely change into increasingly more important of Trans individuals and gender-affirming surgical procedures.

In August this yr, she sparked fury on-line after commenting on Algerian boxer Imane Khelife, who participated within the ladies’s 66 kg (welterweight) boxing occasion on the 2024 Olympics and gained the gold medal.

Rowling caught flack after calling the boxer, who had been beforehand disqualified from one other competitors for not assembly gender eligibility guidelines, a “male who is aware of he is protected by a misogynist sporting institution.”

Khelife has since filed a lawsuit with French authorities, through which she named Rowling and Elon Musk for his or her alleged “acts of aggravated cyber harassment.”

Final month, HBO stood by Rowling after she confronted intense criticism over her views on transgender points.

The community acquired many complaints about Rowling’s function as government producer of the upcoming “Harry Potter” TV sequence.

In a press release to Selection, the community responded: “We’re proud to as soon as once more inform the story of ‘Harry Potter’ – the heartwarming books that talk to the facility of friendship, resolve and acceptance. JK Rowling has a proper to specific her private views. We are going to stay targeted on the event of the brand new sequence, which is able to solely profit from her involvement.”

Regardless of HBO’s protection, the challenge has drawn combined reactions. Some followers criticized the variation as “pointless,” whereas others threatened to boycott the sequence over Rowling’s controversial remarks.

In an interview with Newsweek, Evan Nierman, CEO of PR agency Pink Banyan, mentioned the worth of Warner Bros. Discovery, the mum or dad firm of HBO, supporting Rowling.

He famous, “By publicly supporting J.Ok. Rowling, Warner Bros. is investing in a colossally inventive and profitable creator, versus taking a public stance on the controversial transgender subject.”

In the meantime, cultural analyst and author Areej Shaikh urged that whereas Warner Bros. Discovery’s (WBD) help of Rowling could mirror a shift in how corporations strategy cancel tradition, it does not signify a victory for Rowling within the broader cultural debate.

“This determination signifies a change towards extra publicly endorsing contentious personalities when their inventive affect is valued, however it doesn’t essentially imply Rowling has ‘gained’ the cultural warfare,” she mentioned.

Shaikh additionally famous that the studio “appears to be placing the ‘Harry Potter’ franchise’s cultural and monetary historical past forward of the divisive controversy” plaguing Rowling.

“This technique implies that as an alternative of adopting clear-cut positions, corporations could now be navigating cancel tradition with the next emphasis on putting a steadiness between public opinion and inventive contribution,” the analyst concluded.